Back to Knowledge Hub
Niagara County Waste Water Treatment Plant

Grit removal helps Niagara aeration process breathe again

Case study
13 June 2016

Introduction

Fine grit accumulation in the aeration tank, Niagara County Waste Water Treatment PlantGrit composition at the Niagara County Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) in New York State is characterized by very fine, slow-settling particles. Undetected for eight years, it was choking the efficient operation of the plant. In particular, Niagara was experiencing deterioration in its aeration process: submerged fine air diffusers were fouling due to the accumulation of fine grit particles in the aeration tanks.

Having seen a successful grit removal system in operation at a nearby plant in Buffalo, NY, Niagara installed a Hydro International SlurryCup™ and Grit Snail® system, which enabled tank cleaning times and costs to be significantly reduced and enabled the biological digestion processes to operate efficiently.

The Niagara County Sewer District #1 and Niagara County WWTP are located on the Niagara River in western New York. The River drains four of the Great Lakes and represents possibly the largest flow of fresh water in the world. There are many towns and cities which discharge into this waterway, and the Great Lakes themselves have only recently had their pollution load brought under control, so stringent efforts are made to maintain standards.

“We have a different and more difficult grit problem than most WWTPs,” explains John Timkey, Chief Operator at Niagara. “In my long experience in other treatment plants, Niagara is unusual in that all our incoming sewage is from sanitary sewers, there are no combined sewers bringing in coarser particle grit from road washings and surface water. As a result, most of our grit is very fine and slow settling, and the current headworks was never designed for removing fine grit down to 75 microns or so."

"We don’t have a primary clarifier unit, for example, and raw sewage is pumped straight from grit removal to the aeration tanks. “The old aeration system, installed in the late 1970s, mechanically agitated the top couple of feet of the 14 foot deep tanks and, as a result, grit settled steadily in the bottom of the tank. However, the accumulation was tolerated for many years and was only recognized as a problem when the plant upgraded to the submerged fine air diffuser system.”

Aeration turning inefficient

In 2000, Niagara County upgraded its aeration system to fine bubble diffusers. The original surface aerator had not been particularly effective in aerating the whole water column and it could get flooded in high flow or iced up in winter. The project objective was also to reduce energy costs and to improve the efficiency of the aerobic process by having a slow stream of fine bubbles distributed across the whole tank to allow more interaction with the microbial agents, oxygen and organics.

“In 2000, before my time at Niagara, the four 866,000 gallon, 14 feet deep, aeration tanks were cleaned out in turn and the fine bubble diffusers installed,” says Timkey. “The diffusers are sited about a foot off the tank floor. The process means there is a great density of diffusers to create the fine bubbles and much more pipework across the tank floors, which also meant it was more difficult to clean. That’s probably when grit dynamics changed. The bubble-churned water agitated the slowly settling sediments keeping more solids in suspension, some of it probably ended downstream; but the tanks were steadily accumulating settled fine grit.”

The aeration process worked well for a few years, but then the energy and process efficiency savings started to diminish.

“This was 2008, around the time that I joined Niagara County,” recalls Timkey. “Although no one had kept detailed records of energy use and the decline in air transfer was gradual over the eight year period, we observed bubble flow diminished with many dead spots.”

Diffusers smothered

“We decided to have a look at what was happening, and drained down a tank. We couldn’t see many of the diffusers; they were smothered under three or four feet of fine sediment mixed in with clumps of fibers. The incoming raw water hadn’t changed - it was the process upgrade which had highlighted a pre-existing problem. A contractor was brought in initially to clear the tanks. It was a very onerous task as it was important to avoid damage to the air pipes on the tank floor. For one tank this cost $12,000 – a price that could not really be justified. In the years that followed we decided to give the job to the seasonal workers who were working here during the summer. Between two and four of them at any one time would be detailed to wash a tank with a two inch fire hose at 40 lb pressure, washing layers of grit down to the end where a pump would pick it up. Accumulated grit and sediment were pumped into a baffled channel, then dumped into a dewatering pit and eventually filled into steel containers for transport to landfill. It took all summer to clean out two tanks, which we did every year for five years."

"This cost us perhaps $5,000 - $6,000 per tank, and we were employing local labor, not some long distance contractor. At the time, we did not have any provision in the budget to reconfigure the headworks, so we had to have a more pragmatic solution for making the aeration tanks efficient. We looked at the installation of a mechanical belt press to dewater the removed slurry to reduce disposal costs. However, it turned out to be expensive to run with heavy mechanical maintenance requirements.”

Proven solution

John Timkey had heard that the nearby Bird Island WWTP in Buffalo, NY, had had a similar problem with the upgrading of its aeration basins. “Bird Island was, in fact, a little different, they had combined sewers incoming with a range of grit sizes partly derived from surface water drainage, but their headworks was fairly successful in removing the coarse grit component. When they upgraded to fine bubble aeration, they realized how much the finer grit was affecting them.”

At Bird Island, the solution devised was to regularly pressure-wash drained tanks with fire hoses to fluidize the grit and move it to one end of the tank, then pump the resulting slurry to a skid-mounted SlurryCup™ and Grit Snail® system from Hydro International. This reduces the volatile organic solids contents and discharges a clean dry grit product that is suitable for landfill.

“We realized that this could also be a viable solution for us,” continues Timkey. “Our four basins are conveniently in a close formation with a drainage point, so we could install the SlurryCup™ and Grit Snail® in one place where the four corners of the basins meet. At Bird Island they have a skid-mounted system which they have to move around the 16 tanks.”

Effective performance

The SlurryCup™ provides high-performance degritting, removing grit and fine abrasives as small as 75 microns, with minimal organic solids. Its high energy vortex operates as a centrifugal solids separator and classifier with secondary washing. The solids separation occurs within the unit as a result of centrifugal forces exceeding fluid drag forces. Classification and separation of particles according to size occurs within the boundary layer. Once the particles are captured in the boundary layer and swept to the center, the SlurryCup™ hydraulic valve uses rinse water for secondary washing to separate attached organics. This allows the SlurryCup™ to remove and wash over 90 percent of grit as small as 75 microns in diameter in both headwork and sludge-degritting applications.

The Grit Snail® captures fine grit by providing sufficient clarifier area to retain 75-micron particles. A slow-moving, cleated belt gently lifts grit from the clarifier pool without re-suspending captured fine grit particles, which would allow them to escape with the clarifier overflow. The combined SlurryCup™ and Grit Snail® degritting system delivers clean, dry grit with 60% total solids and less than 20% volatile solids.

Better process, easy clean, good value

“Now we run the SlurryCup™ while cleaning the basins which can take up to 3 weeks (5 days a week for 6-7 hours per day),” concludes Timkey. “A large proportion of the dewatered grit is removed and stored in a five cu. yard containers for removal to the landfill. The SlurryCup™ system only needs to be operated in spring through fall and is put away in winter. The degritted effluent is recycled back into the headworks, for treatment. We remove annually between 10 and 15 tons of grit down to 75 microns dewatered to around 60%, with less than 20% organics. After nearly three years of operation, the aeration tank floors remain clean, and we certainly get better process results from aeration. Also the seasonal workers prefer grass cutting or painting to hosing sewage!"

"It is difficult to put a quantity on energy savings but the energy input remains at an even level, not climbing up to push air through the diffusers against the sediment. An additional advantage is the SlurryCup™ uses no power and is self-cleansing in action, so operating costs are low. We are not convinced that, even if we did upgrade the headworks to remove fine grit, we would get better value than from this solution.”

Get access to restricted resource

Please provide us with your name and email address in order to get access to this resource.